International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme
 


MYP Language A
Grade Descriptors
for grades 6-7

 

Updated 2009

Criterion A

Content (receptive and productive)

Maximum 10

Criterion B

Organization

Maximum 10

Criterion C

Style and language mechanics

Maximum 10

For each assessment criterion, a number of band descriptors are defined. These describe a range of achievement levels with the lowest represented as 0.

The descriptors concentrate on positive achievement, although failure to achieve may be included in the description for lower levels.

 

 

Criterion A: Content (receptive and productive)

How well can the student:

·         understand and  comment on the language, content, structure and meaning of age-appropriate oral, written and visual texts?

·         compare and contrast age appropriate texts and connect themes across and within genres?

·         Comment on the effects of the author’s choices on an audience?

·         express a relevant personal response to literary and non-literary texts?

·         compose pieces that apply appropriate basic literary and/or non-literary features to serve the context and intention?

·         Apply basic terminology in context?

Achievement level

Level descriptor

0

The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below.

1–2

The student demonstrates very limited understanding of the text and topic, and little or no awareness of the author’s choices. There are no relevant details.

In creative work, pieces show very limited imagination or sensitivity; the student does not employ basic literary/non-literary features.

The use of terminology is missing.

3–4

The student demonstrates limited understanding of the text and topic. There is an attempt to show an awareness of the author’s choices, although details, development and support are insufficient.

In creative work, pieces show limited imagination or sensitivity; the student attempts to employ basic literary and/or non-literary features.

There is an attempt to use basic terminology.

5–6

The student demonstrates some understanding of the text and topic, and an awareness of the author’s choices, using some detail, development and support.

In creative work, pieces reflect some imagination and sensitivity; the student generally employs basic literary and/or non-literary features that serve the context and intention.

Basic terminology is sometimes accurate and appropriate.

7–8

The student demonstrates an understanding of the text, topic and an awareness of the author’s choices, using detail, development and support.

In creative work, pieces reflect imagination and sensitivity; the student employs basic literary and/or non-literary features that serve the context and intention.

Basic terminology is usually accurate and appropriate.

9–10

The student demonstrates a good understanding of the text, topic and an awareness of the author’s choices, consistently using detail, development and support.

In creative work, pieces reflect a lot of imagination and sensitivity; the student employs basic literary and/or non-literary features that serve the context and intention.

Basic terminology is accurate and appropriate

Notes

·         The quality and explanation of supporting material is assessed against criterion A, while the structure, ordering and integration of supporting material are assessed under criterion B.

·         The task being assessed against criterion A may involve more than one work or more than one author.

·         Responses to literature must reflect a meaningful personal interaction with the text that shows genuine understanding.

·         This criterion can be applied to oral, written and visual work.

 

 

Criterion B: Organization

How well can the student:

·         create work that employs  basic organizational structures and language-specific conventions throughout a variety of text types?

·         organize ideas and arguments in a coherent and logical manner?

·         employ appropriate basic critical apparatus?

Achievement level

Level descriptor

0

The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below.

1–2

The student does not use basic organizational structures and/or language-specific conventions.

The work is unclear and/or incoherent.

The student uses basic critical apparatus inappropriately or not at all.

3–4

The student attempts to use basic organizational structures and/or language-specific conventions that serve the context and intention.

The work shows the beginnings of organization but lacks coherence.

The student uses basic critical apparatus with limited success.

5–6

The student sometimes uses basic organizational structures and language-specific conventions that serve the context and intention.

The work is generally organized and clear.                            

The student generally uses basic critical apparatus correctly.

7–8

The student usually employs basic organizational structures and language-specific conventions that serve the context and intention.

The work is organized, clear and coherent.

 The student generally uses basic critical apparatus correctly.

9–10

The student consistently uses basic organizational structures and language-specific conventions that serve the context and intention.

The work is well-organized, clear and coherent and the ideas being expressed build on each other.

The student uses basic critical apparatus correctly.

Notes

·         Examples of “critical apparatus” include quotations, citations, references, footnotes, bibliographies, table of contents, outlines, appendices, tables, graphs, labels, headings, italicizing and underlining.

·         The quality and explanation of supporting material is assessed against criterion A, while the structure, ordering and integration of supporting material are assessed under criterion B.

·         This criterion can be applied to oral, written or visual work.

 

Criterion C: Style and language mechanics

How well can the student:

·         use appropriate and varied register, vocabulary and idiom?

·         use correct grammar and syntax?

·         use appropriate and varied sentence structure?

·         use correct spelling?

·         use language to narrate, describe, explain, argue, persuade, inform, entertain and express feelings?

·         use language accurately?

Achievement level

Level descriptor

0

The student does not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors below.

1–2

The student uses a very limited range of appropriate vocabulary, idiom and sentence structure. There are numerous errors in grammar and syntax, which persistently hinder communication.

There is little or no evidence of a register and style that serve the context and intention.

There are very frequent errors in punctuation and spelling/writing, which persistently hinder communication. The student shows little or no competence in oral/presentation work.

3–4

The student uses a limited range of appropriate vocabulary, idiom and sentence structure. There are frequent errors in grammar and syntax, which hinder communication.

There is some evidence of a register and style that serve the context and intention.

There are frequent errors in punctuation and spelling/writing, which hinder communication. The student shows some competence in oral/presentation work.

5–6

The student generally uses a range of appropriate vocabulary, idiom and sentence structure. Grammar and syntax are generally accurate; occasional errors sometimes hinder communication.

The student often uses a register and style that serve the context and intention.

Punctuation and spelling/writing are generally accurate; occasional errors sometimes hinder communication. The student shows adequate competence in oral/presentation work.

7–8

The student generally uses a range of appropriate vocabulary, idiom and sentence structure. Grammar and syntax are generally accurate; occasional errors rarely hinder communication.

The student often uses a register and style that serve the context and intention.

Punctuation and spelling/writing are generally accurate; occasional errors rarely hinder communication. The student shows a good level of competence in oral/presentation work.

9–10

The student uses a range of appropriate vocabulary, idiom and sentence structure. Grammar and syntax are accurate; very infrequent errors do not hinder communication.

The student consistently uses a register and style that serve the context and intention.

 Punctuation and spelling/writing are accurate; very infrequent errors do not hinder communication. The student shows high level of competence in oral/presentation work.

Notes

·         This criterion deals with issues of accuracy of spelling -  not the aesthetics of handwriting.

·         The same recurring error is treated as a single error.

·         Oral/presentation work will assess a combination of pronunciation, intonation, tone, pace, pausing, volume, projection, body language, gesture, eye contact.

·         Pronunciation: clarity is considered here, rather than issues of accent.

·         This criterion can be applied to oral, written and visual work.

 


 

Curriculum Links:
MYP Course Index

MYP Information

MYP Grade Descriptors*

DP Information

DP Grade Descriptors*

IBO website

 

For more information, please contact the MYP Coordinator, DP Coordinator, or the MS/HS Principal.

 

*Due to copyright restrictions, IB descriptors located in our password protected OIS Community site. The password is advertised via the Educator - please contact the MS/HS principal if you have lost it.