International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme
MYP Language A
Grade
Descriptors
for grades 6-7
Updated 2009
Criterion A |
Content (receptive and productive) |
Maximum 10 |
Criterion B |
Organization |
Maximum 10 |
Criterion C |
Style and language mechanics |
Maximum 10 |
For each assessment criterion, a number of band descriptors
are defined. These describe a range of achievement levels
with the lowest represented as 0.
The descriptors concentrate on positive achievement,
although failure to achieve may be included in the
description for lower levels.
Criterion A: Content (receptive and productive)
How well can the student:
·
understand and
comment on the language, content, structure and meaning of
age-appropriate oral, written and visual texts?
·
compare and
contrast age appropriate texts and connect themes across and
within genres?
·
Comment on the
effects of the author’s choices on an audience?
·
express a
relevant personal response to literary and non-literary
texts?
·
compose pieces
that apply appropriate basic literary and/or non-literary
features to serve the context and intention?
·
Apply basic
terminology in context?
Achievement level |
Level descriptor |
0 |
The student does not reach a standard described by
any of the descriptors below. |
1–2 |
The student demonstrates
very limited
understanding of the text and topic, and
little or no
awareness of the author’s choices. There are
no relevant
details.
In creative work, pieces show
very limited
imagination or sensitivity; the student
does not
employ basic literary/non-literary features.
The use of terminology is
missing. |
3–4 |
The student demonstrates
limited
understanding of the text and topic. There is an
attempt to show an awareness of the author’s
choices, although details, development and support
are
insufficient.
In creative work, pieces show
limited
imagination or sensitivity; the student
attempts to
employ basic literary and/or non-literary features.
There is an attempt to use basic terminology. |
5–6 |
The student demonstrates
some
understanding of the text and topic, and an
awareness
of the author’s choices, using
some
detail, development and support.
In creative work, pieces reflect
some
imagination and sensitivity; the student
generally
employs basic literary and/or non-literary features
that serve the context and intention.
Basic terminology is
sometimes
accurate and appropriate. |
7–8 |
The student demonstrates an understanding of
the text, topic and an
awareness
of the author’s choices, using detail, development
and support.
In creative work, pieces reflect imagination and
sensitivity; the student employs basic literary
and/or non-literary features that serve the context
and intention.
Basic terminology is usually accurate and
appropriate. |
9–10 |
The student demonstrates a good understanding
of the text, topic and an
awareness
of the author’s choices,
consistently
using detail, development and support.
In creative work, pieces reflect a
lot
of imagination and sensitivity; the student employs
basic literary and/or non-literary features that
serve the context and intention.
Basic terminology is accurate and appropriate |
Notes
·
The quality
and explanation of supporting material is assessed against
criterion A, while the structure, ordering and integration
of supporting material are assessed under criterion B.
·
The task being
assessed against criterion A may involve more than one work
or more than one author.
·
Responses to
literature must reflect a meaningful personal interaction
with the text that shows genuine understanding.
·
This criterion
can be applied to oral, written and visual work.
Criterion B: Organization
How well can the student:
·
create work
that employs basic organizational structures and
language-specific conventions throughout a variety of text
types?
·
organize ideas
and arguments in a coherent and logical manner?
·
employ
appropriate basic critical apparatus?
Achievement level |
Level descriptor |
0 |
The student does not reach a standard described by
any of the descriptors below. |
1–2 |
The student
does not
use basic organizational structures and/or
language-specific conventions.
The work is
unclear
and/or
incoherent.
The student uses basic critical apparatus
inappropriately
or
not at all. |
3–4 |
The student
attempts to
use basic organizational structures and/or
language-specific conventions that serve the context
and intention.
The work shows the
beginnings
of organization but
lacks coherence.
The student uses basic critical apparatus with
limited success. |
5–6 |
The student
sometimes
uses basic organizational structures and
language-specific conventions that serve the context
and intention.
The work is
generally organized and clear.
The student
generally
uses basic critical apparatus
correctly. |
7–8 |
The student
usually
employs basic organizational structures and
language-specific conventions that serve the context
and intention.
The work is
organized, clear and coherent.
The student
generally
uses basic critical apparatus
correctly. |
9–10 |
The student consistently uses basic
organizational structures and language-specific
conventions that serve the context and intention.
The work is well-organized, clear and
coherent and the ideas being expressed build on each
other.
The student uses basic critical apparatus
correctly. |
Notes
·
Examples of
“critical apparatus” include quotations, citations,
references, footnotes, bibliographies, table of contents,
outlines, appendices, tables, graphs, labels, headings,
italicizing and underlining.
·
The quality
and explanation of supporting material is assessed against
criterion A, while the structure, ordering and integration
of supporting material are assessed under criterion B.
·
This criterion
can be applied to oral, written or visual work.
Criterion C: Style and language mechanics
How well can the student:
·
use
appropriate and varied register, vocabulary and idiom?
·
use correct
grammar and syntax?
·
use
appropriate and varied sentence structure?
·
use correct
spelling?
·
use language
to narrate, describe, explain, argue, persuade, inform,
entertain and express feelings?
·
use language
accurately?
Achievement level |
Level descriptor |
0 |
The student does not reach a standard described by
any of the descriptors below. |
1–2 |
The student uses a
very limited range of appropriate
vocabulary, idiom and sentence structure. There are
numerous
errors in grammar and syntax, which
persistently hinder
communication.
There is
little or no evidence
of a register and style that serve the context and
intention.
There are
very frequent errors
in punctuation and spelling/writing, which
persistently hinder
communication. The student shows little or no
competence in oral/presentation work.
|
3–4 |
The student uses a
limited range of appropriate
vocabulary, idiom and sentence structure. There are
frequent
errors in grammar and syntax, which
hinder
communication.
There is
some evidence
of a register and style that serve the context and
intention.
There are
frequent errors
in punctuation and spelling/writing, which
hinder
communication. The student shows
some
competence in oral/presentation work. |
5–6 |
The student
generally
uses a range of
appropriate
vocabulary, idiom and sentence structure. Grammar
and syntax are
generally
accurate;
occasional
errors
sometimes hinder
communication.
The student
often uses
a register and style that serve the context and
intention.
Punctuation and spelling/writing are
generally
accurate;
occasional
errors
sometimes hinder
communication. The student shows
adequate
competence in oral/presentation work. |
7–8 |
The student
generally
uses a range of
appropriate
vocabulary, idiom and sentence structure. Grammar
and syntax are
generally
accurate;
occasional errors
rarely hinder
communication.
The student
often uses
a register and style that serve the context and
intention.
Punctuation and spelling/writing are
generally accurate;
occasional errors
rarely hinder
communication. The student shows a
good level
of competence in oral/presentation work. |
9–10 |
The student uses a range of
appropriate
vocabulary, idiom and sentence structure. Grammar
and syntax are accurate;
very infrequent
errors do not hinder communication.
The student
consistently uses
a register and style that serve the context and
intention.
Punctuation and spelling/writing are
accurate;
very infrequent
errors do not hinder communication. The student
shows
high level
of competence in oral/presentation work. |
Notes
·
This criterion
deals with issues of accuracy of
spelling - not the aesthetics of handwriting.
·
The same
recurring error is treated as a single error.
·
Oral/presentation work will assess a combination of
pronunciation, intonation, tone, pace, pausing, volume,
projection, body language, gesture, eye contact.
·
Pronunciation:
clarity is considered here, rather than issues of accent.
·
This criterion
can be applied to oral, written and visual work.
Curriculum Links:
MYP
Course Index
MYP Information
MYP Grade
Descriptors*
DP
Information
DP Grade
Descriptors*
IBO website
For more
information, please contact the MYP Coordinator, DP
Coordinator, or the MS/HS Principal.
*Due to copyright
restrictions, IB descriptors located in our password
protected OIS Community site. The password is advertised via
the Educator - please contact the MS/HS principal if you
have lost it.
|